Wednesday, December 8, 2010

China Telecom Reroutes 15% of The Internet

For about 18 minutes in April, a Chinese telecommunications company hijacked 15 percent of the Internet, redirecting U.S. government and military traffic through Chinese servers. The misdirection affected NASA, all four branches of the military, the office of the Secretary of Defense and the U.S. Senate.


We don’t yet know what this means — the U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission, which released report on the incident today, says it is unclear whether it was intentional or just an accident — but at the very least, it’s one more piece of disturbing evidence showing the U.S. is vulnerable to cyberattack.


The hijacking was reported when it first happened, but this is the first acknowledgement that American government sites were affected. Along with the military and organizations like NASA and NOAA, the redirect affected commercial websites like Dell, Yahoo, Microsoft and IBM, according to ABC News, which broke the story this morning.


It’s not clear what happened to the data once it was rerouted through China Telecom, which is denying any hijack of Internet traffic. It could have been a pure technical error that “advertised erroneous network traffic routes that instructed U.S. and other foreign Internet traffic to travel through Chinese servers,” as the report puts it.


Whether or not this was an innocent mistake, it’s clear the capability to reroute huge streams of data could enable malicious activities. Given Chinese entities’ Internet history, this is not good news. Remember last January’s attack on Google, intended to get human rights activists’ e-mail addresses?


From the report: “This level of access could enable surveillance of specific users or sites. It could disrupt a data transaction and prevent a user from establishing a connection with a site. It could even allow a diversion of data to somewhere that the user did not intend.”
Government officials are claiming their traffic was encrypted. so they have nothing to fear. But when members of Congress are “100 percent certain” the U.S. will suffer a cyberattack, incidents like this should sound the alarm.
[
Via Pop-Sci]

Sunday, December 5, 2010

Upgrading=Downgrading?

2010 Volvo C30
Usually when you hear that a new car model is coming out you would expect some small aesthetic differences, new technology and maybe a better engine. Unfortunately, because of this issue called global warming everyone wants fuel efficient cars, changing what we would usually expect from a new car. So in order to get people to buy their cars, car manufacturers are devising ways to make their cars more and more fuel efficient. The most common ways to do this is to make cars lighter, able to use E85 gas and make hybrid models. Apparently this isn’t enough so automakers including Volkswagen, Audi, Volvo and Fiat (a European company) have decided that in their newer models they will be putting downsized engines that are fuel efficient due to the sole fact that they are TINY!

 To the car enthusiasts dismay (me included) more and more cars are becoming this way and they are going to keep coming. For example the lowest end Corolla has a 1.6 liter engine and the lowest end Nissan, the Versa starts at $9,900 has a 1.6 liter engine. Volvo has been planning on debuting a new engine that is also 1.6 liters with 113 horsepower, but the problem is that Volvo does not make any tiny cars. At the moment, their smallest car starts at $24,000 and has a 2.5 liter engine making 227 horsepower. If they try to stick this tiny engine into any of their cars, I will probably cry. As always please comment bellow!

High Speed Trains

In this photo released by China's Xinhua news agency, a China Railway High-Speed (CRH) train enters Bengbu south railway station, a stop in Anhui prov
Almost everywhere in the world except for the US use trains as a means of transportation across long distances. Some countries even have high speed train networks such as France, China and Japan. China has decided that just being a part of this list wasn’t good enough but they needed to be better than everyone else.

During their last test run, the Chinese hit a top speed of 302 miles per hour (486 kilometers per hour) between Beijing and Shanghai. This is a world record speed for an unmodified commercial train. When the line opens in 2012, the 824 mile (1318 kilometers) journey will be cut by five hours because of the ridiculously high speed of the trains. China already has the world's longest high-speed rail network, and it plans to cover 8,125 miles (13,000 kilometers) by 2012 and 10,000 miles (16,000 kilometers) by 2020.

This is all well and good for China but where the heck is our high speed railway?? In President Obama’s stimulus plan, there is $8 BILLION allocated for building nine lines for “bullet trains”. The plan calls for three lines to run through Illinois, turning Chicago into a bullet train hub. One would connect Milwaukee and Madison, Wisconsin, to Chicago and might later join Milwaukee to Minneapolis and St. Paul, Minnesota. In Ohio, a line would connect the cities of Cleveland, Cincinnati and Columbus.


 Why isn’t this happening you ask you ask? One reason is because so government officials are worried that the money should be used to fix our road and highway system instead of creating a railroad that is “unwanted”.  Wisconsin Governor-elect Scott Walker wrote this in a letter to the Transportation secretary, Ray LaHood, "I believe it is a grave mistake for the federal government to insist on building an unwanted passenger rail system at a time when our roads and bridges are literally crumbling," 

I personally think that we should be building these trains as they would greatly lower the congestion on inter-city highways and would be much more convenient than driving and cheaper than flying. If you have a different opinion please comment bellow!

Robotic Camera Mimics Speed Of Human Eye


Some researchers at the Technical University of Munich have built an unassuming but no-less-remarkable mechanism for tilting and panning a small camera robotically. Designed to keep up with the eye movements of a human in gaze-tracking studies, the camera mount features three degrees of movement, and can flick around at a rapid 2500 degrees per second -- our flesh-composed eyeballs max out at a mere 1000. The setup uses ultrasonic piezo-actuators, which move prismatic joints, which drive spherically-jointed rods attached to the camera, keeping the weight under 100 grams and still acting gently enough to avoid rattling on top of the wearer's head.
[Via Engadget]

Friday, December 3, 2010

NASA Find New Life


Biologists have isolated a bacterium that can use a deadly chemical in place of one of life’s key building blocks, in a finding NASA says could have major implications for astrobiology and our understanding of life on Earth.

In the study, researchers examined a bacteria living in a very salty and arsenic-heavy lake in northeastern California, not far from Yosemite National Park. It is not a space alien, nor is it “new life” — it’s an existing bacteria that lives in a difficult environment and was deliberately manipulated in a lab.

But the results are interesting because nothing like this has ever been done before. All life as we know it depends on six key ingredients — carbon, hydrogen, oxygen, nitrogen, sulfur and phosphorus. This bacteria can switch from phosphorus to arsenic — usually a deadly toxin — and not only survive, but thrive. It can swap arsenic for phosphorus so completely that arsenic is incorporated into its DNA and other biomolecules like ATP, according to the study. This is a first, and it upends our assumptions about how life works.

What this means for astrobiology is pretty speculative, however. When looking for life in other worlds, especially promising places like Saturn’s moon Titan or in the Martian soil, scientists look for telltale signs of life as we know it. That means carbon-based life, respiration with oxygen and carbon dioxide, amino acids, and so on.
This finding tells us that we should ditch these assumptions and broaden our horizons. If a humble Earthling bacteria can live on a poisonous chemical, then who knows what might lurk elsewhere in the solar system? We’ll have to recalibrate our mass spectrometers.

"I find this result delightful because it may have to expand my notion of what environmental constituents might enable habitability," said Pamela Conrad, an astrobiologist at NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center and a principal investigator on the new Curiosity Mars rover, which will carry experiments designed to look for signs of life. "The implication is that we still don't know everything there is to know about what might make a habitable environment on another planet. We have to increasingly broaden our perspective."

In terms of its metabolism, the bacterium — a proteobacteria called GFAJ-1 — is actually not very interesting, according to Felisa Wolfe-Simon, a scientist with NASA's Astrobiology Institute and lead author of the paper released today. It is not a chemosynthetic bacteria, for instance, using chemicals instead of light to produce food. In that way, it's less exciting than well-studied extremophiles that live near superheated hydrothermal vents or the unforgiving sulfur lakes of Yellowstone National Park.

But it's interesting because it's a chemical mutant. In an arsenic-enriched environment in Wolfe-Simon's lab, its very DNA changed. It swapped arsenic for phosphorus in the nucleic acids that make up the backbone of DNA, and that's a revolutionary result, Elser said.

"Every living thing uses phosphorus to build its DNA," Elser said at a press conference Thursday. "The fact that I am sitting here today discussing the possibility that that is not true is quite shocking."

At the very least, that is interesting for our understanding of microbes, Wolfe-Simon said. Microorganisms are the oldest and most prevalent form of life, and this study shows that we know less about them than we thought. There may be many other species of microbes that can tolerate or thrive with arsenic, for instance. This is just the first time anyone has really ever tried to find one.

Wolfe-Simon said she had been thinking about chemical substitution for several years. Back in 2006, while she was a postdoctoral fellow at ASU, she proposed looking for life forms that can survive even substituting various chemicals for the building blocks of life. It's not a wild hypothesis — there are a few previous examples of trace metallic elements substituting for one another, including the switching of copper for iron as an oxygen carrier in some mollusks, for instance. The swapped elements share some chemical similarities, making the transition simpler.

Arsenic and phosphorus are also chemically analagous — arsenic is directly below phosphorus on your periodic table, and the elements have the same number of electrons in their outer shells, which makes them behave similarly. So swapping arsenic for phosphorus makes sense on paper. Wolfe-Simon wanted to find out if it worked in practice, and she went looking in a likely place — California's Mono Lake, which teems with life despite containing high levels of arsenic and a salinity level three times that of the oceans.

Wolfe-Simon and colleagues took core samples from the lake and brought GFAJ-1 into the lab. They simulated the lake environment and diluted the natural phosphorus until the mixture was rich in arsenic instead. The microbe thrived, and grew 1.5 times its previous size — its cells developed internal vacuole-like structures that account for some of that growth. Conrad, at NASA, said it makes sense that a life form's structure would change in response to its environment.
The team used various types of analysis to show the microbe accumulated arsenic in its DNA. It still contained some phosphorus, too, but not nearly enough to account for its growth, Wolfe-Simon said.

She is already working on an updated study to determine what the microbe will do when it can replicate with both arsenic and phosphorus as DNA ingredients. It will likely be the first of many studies to determine what the microbe can do — and how it can be used. It could help clean up arsenic-laden toxic waste, for instance. In a world with diminishing energy supplies (and dwindling phosphorus supplies) it could even conceivably lead to non-phosphorus-based sources of biofuel. But for now, that's largely science fiction, Elser said.

And, despite the hype over this little microbe, alien life remains firmly in that category as well.
[Via Pop-Sci]

Hydrogen, Solar and Wind powered Ferry


Plan on visiting the Statue of Liberty and Ellis Island via ferry next year? If so, pay close attention to the vessel you board, as it just might be the world's first to rely on hydrogen, solar and wind power for motorization. Currently, the New York Hornblower Hybrid (not to be confused with the San Francisco Hornblower Hybrid) is under construction in Bridgeport, Connecticut, and if all goes well, it'll reach completion in April. The 600-passenger boat be equipped with Tier 2 diesel engines, hydrogen fuel cells, solar panels and wind turbines, with power coming from a proton exchange membrane fuel cell that turns hydrogen into electricity. We're told that the diesel rigs will only kick in to cover "additional energy needs," but it's hard to say how often they'll actually be used. The eventual goal, however, is to do away with emissions altogether in the ferry process, and it seems that the technology is already capable of being scaled for use in other hybrid ferries, hybrid yachts and even hybrid tugs.
[Via Engadget]

Wednesday, December 1, 2010

We're Baaaccckk

Yes its true, new articles will be posted starting this week.

Twitter Delicious Facebook Digg Stumbleupon Favorites More

 
Powered by Blogger