Sunday, October 17, 2010

Why A Chicken Slushie Isn't Gross


Last week, I report on what chicken nuggets were really made of. I might have over done it just a little bit.

The twisting pink mass that looks like frozen yogurt infected might look disgusting. It might be mechanically separated chicken, chicken nuggets in their primordial form. And it is perfectly okay to eat.

The goop freaked readers out, not only because it looks weird, but because of the description that came along with it:

Because it's crawling with bacteria, it will be washed with ammonia, soaked in it, actually. Then, because it tastes gross, it will be reflavored artificially. Then, because it is weirdly pink, it will be dyed with artificial color.

Daniel Fletcher at the University of Connecticut is a food scientist who's been working with poultry for a long time. Genial and approachable, he sounds more folksy farmer than mad scientist, but he knows a lot about the dark arts of meat manipulation: He's famously transformed dark chicken meat into white meat, precisely to be used by the fast food industry. 

Not all chicken nuggets are made from mechanically separated chicken meat. There's actually two general categories of nuggets, Fletcher says. A "whole muscle product" uses a whole piece of meat, which is coated and fried. (Think Chick-Fil-A nuggets.) Then there's a "chop-and-form" product which is more like a hamburger. The latter makes use of "cuts that wouldn't cook well or prepare well in another manner." After you cut up a chicken for the breasts and the legs, there's a lot of perfectly good meat left, so "we trim off the other pieces and make them into other products." To be fair, that's pretty much how you make a hot dog, too.

But mechanically separated chicken, while it goes through a process, the whole point is pull out what's good, not mash bones into your chicken nuggets. The meat, when it's is chopped up very finely into a paste, is called the "batter." And ground chicken? It's pink. Just shove a piece of raw chicken from the grocery store into a food processor, Fletcher says, and you'll see that the result looks like just like that: a pink paste.

Fletcher breaks his calm demeanor just once, when I ask about purifying chicken batter with ammonia to rid it of bacterial infestations, shocked at the suggestion: "You don't mix ammonia with food! That's illegal! And it's stupid. I've never seen anybody pull a stunt like that. These guys invest big money in that product, and would never do that."

"It's a highly regulated business," says Flethcher, and one that's "very conscious of its image." More to the point, "they don't put out products that people don't buy." Which, combined with the recent history of food science, explains the rise of chicken goop.

One of the major mandates of food science, starting in around the 1970s, when Fletcher first started out, was to "was to extend the food supply by making desirable products out of less desirable material," preparing for a world where protein shortages were common.

That didn't happen.

Instead, food got cheap, and when food is cheap, people are pickier about what they eat. Today, "people want breast meat. They don't want dark meat. Dark meat is a byproduct of the meat now." That's a lot of unloved chicken, that, via the magic of food science, is filling the bellies of tons of gleeful people across the country. Even if the idea of blended, formed and fried chicken grosses you out, it's hard to dismiss Fletcher's moral imperative: "If we're going to kill an animal for food, we're obligated to use the whole thing."
[Via Gizmodo]

Random FBI Tracking GPS Found



Most people would freak out and call the police if they found a cylindrical shaped thing attached to an antenna underneath their car, this is exactly what happened to Yasir Afifi but he did not react like most people.

When 20 year old Yasir went to go pick up his car from the mechanic he was informed that the mechanic found this cylindrical device stuck to the bottom of his car. Instead of asking the police to come and inspect it, he decided to take pictures of the device and then post his story on Reddit. While he was doing this he and his friends were deciding what to do with it such as sticking it one someone else's car or even selling it on craigslist! Soon after they started thinking about what to do when Afifi noticed two "sneaky looking" people outside his apartment so he quickly got into his car and drove off. Before he got anywhere two FBI agents pulled him over and demanded that that he return their property and if he didn’t comply they threatened "We're going to make this much more difficult for you if you don't cooperate."

I'm sure many people out there are screaming in outrage that the government is tracking random people without their knowledge but I personally think that it is a necessary precaution. If you have nothing to hide then it shouldn’t matter if the government can track you or not. 

Robotic Mannequin Mimics Your Shape, Showing How Online Purchases Will Fit




Today FastCo reports on a shape-shifting robotic mannequin that can conform to your specific body measurements to show you how an online clothing vendor’s wares will wear on your unique frame.

Fits.me, an Estonian start-up, created the robot to solve the great clothing conundrum of online retail: customers want to shop for clothing online, but they also want to try on clothes to see how they fit before they purchase. This, Fits.me figure, is why two-thirds of all books are now sold online, but only eight percent of clothing is.
Their robot can recreate more than 2,000 male body types, replicating an array of different body types. Rather than mimicking your beer belly in real time, the robot tries on a retailer’s clothing lines in every possible size on every possible body type, saving photos to a database. When you shop, you simply enter your specs into the retailer’s Web site. Fits.me retrieves the photo of the robot surrogate recreating your specs wearing the garment of your choice so you can see the difference, say, between a medium and a large.

Currently there is only a male version of the mannequin, but a female version of the ‘bot is under development, and should be recreating bust lines online by year’s end.
[Via PopSci]

Director James Cameron To Film Avatar Sequel and Claim X Prize At the Same Time

The Challenger Deep dive was one of the most extraordinary, in addition to little known, feats of human exploration in history, the voyage in a submarine to a place even more extreme than the surface of most planets.

Twelve men have walked on the surface of the Moon and about 500 have travelled into space, but only Piccard and Walsh have visited the very deepest point of the ocean, which they reached on January 23, 1960.

Now it has been announced that the multi-Oscar-winning film director James Cameron plans to add his name to the very exclusive club of those who have travelled to the bottom of the Challenger Deep, part of the Mariana Trench in the western Pacific, and the deepest known point in the world’s oceans.

Attempting such a feat would hardly be a first for the director, who has dived into deep waters several times on because of his films, including “Titanic” and “Aliens of the Deep.” The “Avatar” sequel will reportedly be set in the fictional oceans of Pandora.

In addition, it was reported that he has commissioned a submarine, built of high-tech, man-made composite materials and powered by electric motors, which will be capable of surviving the tremendous pressures at a depth of seven miles, from which he will shoot 3D footage that may be incorporated in Avatar’s sequel.

According to the reports, Cameron has commissioned a team of Australian engineers to design and build a submersible capable of taking him to the floor of the Challenger Deep, and capable of filming in 3D at these depths.

If Cameron succeeds in his voyage to the bottom of the sea, what will he find? In all likelihood nothing more than the etiolated crustacean and fish spotted by Piccard and Walsh. But the abyssal floor at the bottom of this trench remains by far the least explored environment on Earth. Indeed, we have better maps of the surface of Mars than we do of the bottom of the Pacific. However if he can, he could win a $10 million X Prize.

Later this year, the X Prize Foundation is expected to formally announce a $10 million award to commemorate the 50th anniversary of the Trieste's dive. The winnings will go to the first privately funded sub to make two repeat manned descents to Challenger Deep.

And this means there are bound to be surprises. Many scientists suspect that some large animals, giant squid and perhaps even whales may occasionally plunge to extreme depths and survive, despite the cold, the pressure, the lack of light and absence of food.

Google TV



Most of us don’t have time in our busy schedule to watch TV on TV so we end up watching many of our favorite shows on the computer on sites like Netflix and Hulu. Google wants us to be able to watch and find all our shows on our TV rather than our small computers so they have released Google TV. What is Google TV and with big companies such as Sony, Logitech, Intel, Dish Network, and Best Buy is it worth it? Read further and find out!

First of all Google TV is not a single thing like Apple TV is, it is more of a software that can be run on many devices. As of now, you can get Google TV two different ways, through a separate box (very much like the Apple TV) that connects to your existing TV or you can spend some money and buy one of Sony's new TVs that are coming with Google TV built in. What Google TV does is it combines everything you can find on the internet with everything you can find with your existing TV service with Google's search engine.

When you turn on the TV, you will be greeted by a customizable homepage where you can set different channels to be shown through thumbnails (If you are familiar with Google Chrome, Google TV's homepage looks very similar to Chrome's). One of the most important features of Google TV is its search and its full browser. From the home screen, you can search for example, "House", this will search your TV guide for listings and if its in the future give you the option to record it (provided you are a Dish Network subscriber that already has a DVR box), search all your recorded shows on your DVR and it will also search the web. This will be the first implementation of a full browser, including the newest version of Flash, for TV. So theoretically, after searching your TV listings and DVR, and finding nothing, you can just type "House", hit web search, and then you can go watch it on Hulu.com with no hindrances. You can even be browsing the web and have a picture in picture type thing where a mini screen will be running, for example a football game.



Since Google TV is obviously made by Google, it is based off of the Android operating system that is Apple's biggest app competitor. Not only does Google TV deal with TV but it can also run almost any Android app! Obviously it wont be able to run the apps that require hardware found only in phones like cameras and accelerometers but that still leaves us with more than enough apps for to play with *cough* Angry Birds *cough*. But there will soon be apps built for Google TV. NBA already has an app out that will automatically find any upcoming games on TV and set your DVR to record them.

You can control Google TV by the remote that comes with the Sony TV which in my opinion would look really intimidating to the average consumer because of its full QWERTY keyboard. But since you will be surfing the web and the one of the main feature is searching, a keyboard is a must have feature. If the remote really scares you, you can actually use any phone that runs the android operating system, such as the multitude of Droid phones and the newer HTC phones, as the remote. If the idea of using a keyboard really scares you, even if it is on your phone, then you can always resort to voice search. Rather than typing "House" you can just say "House" right into your phones microphone and it will search just like that.


All in all I'm, this sounds like a really good idea and it has a lot of potential. We must remember though, this is what everyone said about the Apple TV and that turned out to be a failure, but if there's any company that can make this work, its Google. 



Sunday, October 10, 2010

Fingerprint Wallet Only Opens For You

When I recently heard that seller of luxury men's goods, Alfred Dunhill, was selling a secure biometric wallet, I was intrigued. I mean who wouldn't want a carbon fiber billfold that only opened with your fingerprint, and alerted you when it lost Bluetooth contact with your cellphone? Cost to the consumer: $700. Sounded like a pretty good deal, at least until we were hepped to a little something called the iWallet. Apparently the same thing (sans the snooty English rebadge), this bad boy is available in a variety of colors, including a fiber glass ($400) or lightweight carbon fiber ($600) case -- and it's made in the USA.

Toasted-Skin-Syndrome

What Is Toasted Skin Syndrome?

Most of us have our own laptops that we spend too much of our time on. If you're sitting in bed you probably have the laptop on your lap and most of us know that laptops can get pretty hot but don’t think too much about it. Now evidence says that we really need to stop doing this or else we may get Toasted-Skin-Syndrome.

Recently in the November issue of Pediatrics, a couple of Swiss scientists came across a boy that had an odd web like pattern of discoloration all across his left thigh. After he thought about it, the boy realized that the left side of his laptop gets extremely hot when it's used. The web pattern is most likely caused by all the blood in the area slowing down. This is a fairly serious reaction that does not happen very often but some patients have even been known to get skin cancer after long heat exposures. Many males have also been known to become infertile because the extreme temperatures kill all the sperm. If this isn’t reason enough for all the guys out there to at least put a pillow or something in between them and their laptop then I don’t know what is.


What Is Toasted Skin Syndrome?

Toasted-Skin-Syndrome is not a new or recent discovery, it has actually been happening for centuries. The difference is that the people who got it before were people who were exposed to extreme amounts of heat on a daily basis such as someone who worked with the furnaces of steam trains or other steam powered things.


For the most part I don't use a laptop but everything I mentioned above applies to electric blankets too! This is a problem because whenever I am doing my homework (which is a lot of my free time) I am under an electric blanket so this might be a problem for me!

Pacemakers Can Alert Doctors No Matter Where You Are

The Dutch research organization Imec has created a new way to monitor a patient's implanted sensors. Many patients have for example, a pacemaker implanted by a doctor so that it can be read by a special sensor at home or at the office. The drawback to this is that obviously you must use be at your home or wherever you happen to have the sensor. Imec has now created a little sensor that you wear around your neck that acts as a median between your phone and the sensor. The sensor will pick up the information from the implanted sensors and then in turn relay the info to your cell phone. The sensor gathers data every 100 milliseconds from the pacemaker and then sends it to the phone. From your phone it can be sent directly to your doctor. You can also set the app up to alert you or even text someone else when your heart rate and blood pressure are approaching dangerous levels.
Right now the app is only available for the Android operating system but hopefully it will be available for all operating systems. The Sensor worn around the neck uses the obscure sounding nRF24L01+ radio frequency, which was developed by Nordic Semiconductor, rather than the more common Bluetooth radio frequency. What this means to the average person is that instead of having to charge the sensor every day, which is what you would have to do if it were using Bluetooth, you only have to charge the sensor every seven days or a week.

Playbook vs. iPad

The newest contestant in the battle to become the best tablet is the BlackBerry Playbook. At the moment this market is dominated by the iPad which is made by Apple but will this by iPad killer?? Read and find out!

The Playbook will have a 7 inch (1024 x 600) LCD multi-touchscreen. While it is smaller compared to the iPad's 9.7 inch (1024 x 768) screen the Playbook has a higher pixel density meaning pictures and videos will actually look better on the Playbook than the iPad. The larger screen size on the iPad obviously makes it the heavier than the Playbook which is only 0.9 pounds compared to the iPad which is about 1.5 pounds. The operating system on the Playbook is called the BlackBerry Tablet OS (very creative right?). It looks very nice and smooth, unlike the BlackBerry OS for their smartphones, and I like it a lot except they copied one of its most important features from a deferent OS. Multitasking. The Playbooks version of multitasking is virtually identical the WebOS "card" system. Myself being a WebOS user, I'm a little bit mad as the "card" system is known as the absolute best way to multitask and is one of the major selling points for the Palm Pre and Pixi which run WebOS.

Palm Pre
BlackBerry Playbook

 The Playbook and the iPad both have 1 GHz processers but the Playbook has a monstrous 1 GB of RAM compared to the iPads puny 256 MB. For all you non-techies out there, what does his mean? Well the more RAM you have the more things you can having running at once. I guess that since the iPad can't multitask right now, it isn’t that big of a deal but supposedly in November it will be able to multitask. The Playbook of course can already multitask and having 1 GB of RAM will enhance the experience greatly.

The Playbook will have the usual stuff like Wi-Fi and Bluetooth 2.1 but it won't have GPS. Come-on Blackberry….you call this the first "professional tablet" but no GPS? How are the "professional" business men supposed to find their way around the cities they go to for their "professional" meetings?? I guess they could just use their BlackBerry smart phones…While I am talking about BB phones I'll mention one really cool feature that BlackBerry has added to its devices. If you edit something on the Playbook, for example a contact's detail, it will automatically be synchronized to your BlackBerry smartphone.

The biggest feature that the Playbook has that the iPad doesn’t is its cameras. Yes I meant to make that plural. The Playbook not only has a rear facing 5 megapixel camera that is capable of taking 1080p HD video (!!) but it also has a 3 megapixel front facing camera! This camera can be used for a variety of things such as taking pictures of yourself and others easier since you can check the screen to make sure everyone is in it but more importantly it can be used for video conferencing. This is one feature that really pushes the "professional" feature of this tablet. With most flights now offering in-flight Wi-Fi, business people can now for instance, chat with a potential client while in the air saving precious time in their busy lifestyle.

So all in all which is better? Personally I like the iPad purely because of its enormous app store and its huge screen. If you are willing to have a smaller screen and don’t care too much about the apps then the Playbook is definitely the best option available. Leave any questions and comments below!
Courtesy of Engadget.com





Saturday, October 9, 2010

iPads Increase Sales of Wine


Some restaurants across the world are now using iPads to show their wine lists. I know dumb, waste of money, novelty. But then why are they selling more wine?

In Atlanta's most famed steakhouse. Bone's, which has over,350 labels in their catalog, sold 11 percent more wine than in the three weeks previous to the iPad introduction. Like Bone's, many restaurants around the world are having the same experience. Everyone using iPad wine lists seem to be having big sales jumps.

As Bone's owners and clients say, "It's not the novelty factor." The reason is easy: Reviews.

Most people don't know most items in a restaurant wine list. They may know that certain region and certain winery and certain grape and certain year are considered to be good or bad or just nice enough. But with so many choices, most people just don't know. 

Now, if you had instant access to a short review for each wine from a credible source, then you can make a decision on the spot. So when someone says that a 1995 Pingus is "one of the greatest and most exciting wines I have ever tasted", then you may decide that it's well worth the price tag.

But then again, why not just print the reviews on paper? Because it’s way easier to keep the iPad always updated, as entries get out of stock and new ones come in.


That's Not Ice Cream...


This is mechanically separated chicken. Chickens are turned into this goop so we can create delicious chicken nuggets and juicy chicken patties. It's obscenely gross and borderline alien but it's not going to stop me from eating nuggets. They're too good.
The process works a little something like this:

There's more: because it's crawling with bacteria, it will be washed with ammonia, soaked in it, actually. Then, because it tastes gross, it will be reflavored artificially. Then, because it is weirdly pink, it will be dyed with artificial color.

Yeah, that's just disgusting. But I can't shake my roots. I'm a chicken nugget fan/fast food fan for life. Also does anyone else think it looks like strawberry ice cream?

Mechanically separated meat (MSM) and mechanically separated poultry (MSP) are terms used to refer to products created by mechanization which allows meat processors to recover edible meat tissue from the carcasses of animals. Prior to the mid-20th century, a good deal of meat scraps and tissue from food animals such as cows, pigs, chickens, and turkeys went to waste because processors had no efficient means of separating it from the bones after the rest of the meat had been removed from carcasses. This recovery process was largely done manually (when it was undertaken at all) until the development of machines in the 1960s that automated the process, making it faster, cheaper, and higher-yielding.

Mechanically separated meat is a paste-like or batter-like meat product created by forcing unstripped bones under high pressure through a type of sieve to separate edible meat tissue (including tendons and muscle fiber) from the bones. Contrary to what is claimed above, the process does not involve the grinding up of entire animal carcasses ("bones, eyes, guts, and all") into one large, amorphous glob of meat; it is a technique for removing what is left on the bones of a carcass after all other processing has been completed. (Also, although meat packing plants typically use anhydrous ammonia for refrigeration purposes, with ammonia leakages having on occasion caused contamination issues at such plants, and sometimes introduce additional ammonium hydroxide into meat as an antibacterial agent, poultry processors do not routinely "soak" MSP in ammonia.)

MSM is typically used in cheaper meat products (such as hot dogs, chicken nuggets, and frozen dinners) which need not retain the appearance, shape, or texture of "regular" meat. In order to satisfy consumer preferences, food producers may utilize additives in MSM-derived products in order to alter their color, taste, or texture. (Although McDonald's Chicken McNuggets are typically offered as an example of a popular MSP-based food, since 2003 that product has been made with all white meat rather than MSP.)
According to the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), mechanically separated poultry is safe to eat and may be used without restriction, however in commercial food products it must be labeled as such:

Mechanically separated poultry (MSP) is a paste-like and batter-like poultry product produced by forcing bones, with attached edible tissue, through a sieve or similar device under high pressure to separate bone from the edible tissue. Mechanically separated poultry has been used in poultry products since the late 1960's. In 1995, a final rule on mechanically separated poultry said it was safe and could be used without restrictions. However, it must be labeled as "mechanically separated chicken or turkey" in the product's ingredients statement. The final rule became effective November 4, 1996. Hot dogs can contain any amount of mechanically separated chicken or turkey.

However, due to concerns over the spread of Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy (commonly known as "mad cow disease"), the sale of MSM-derived beef products for human consumption in the U.S. was banned in 2004:

In 1982, a final rule published by FSIS (the Food Safety and Inspection Service) on mechanically separated meat said it was safe and established a standard of identity for the food product. Some restrictions were made on how much can be used and the type of products in which it can be used. These restrictions were based on concerns for limited intake of certain components in MSM, like calcium.

Due to FSIS regulations enacted in 2004 to protect consumers against Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy, mechanically separated beef is considered inedible and is prohibited for use as human food. It is not permitted in hot dogs or any other processed product.

Mechanically separated pork is permitted and must be labeled as "mechanically separated pork" in the ingredients statement. Hot dogs can contain no more than 20% mechanically separated pork.

Here's a clip from Jamie Oliver's Food Revolution that shows a simplifiedprocess by which mechanically recovered poultry is turned into chicken nuggets or patties. It also shows how gross those kids are.

Sunday, October 3, 2010

Mind-Controlling Battle Helmets


The DARPA (Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency) has been trying to get inside the minds of soldiers for a while now, but a new ultrasound technology could let them get even further. Working under a DARPA grant, a researcher at Arizona State is developing an ultrasound technology that could be implanted in soldiers’ helmets, which would allow soldiers to manipulate their brain functions to boost alertness, relieve stress, or even reduce the effects of traumatic brain injury.

Manipulating the brain to enhance a soldier’s capabilities and maintain mental acuity on the battlefield has long been a topic of interest for DARPA and various military research labs, but the technology to do so remains limited. Deep brain stimulation (DBS), for instance, requires surgically implanted electrodes to stimulate neural tissues, while less-invasive methods like transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) possess limited reach and low spatial resolution.

But Dr. William J. Tyler, an assistant professor of life sciences at ASU, writes on the DoD’s  “Armed With Science” blog: “To overcome the above limitations, my laboratory has engineered a novel technology which implements transcranial pulsed ultrasound to remotely and directly stimulate brain circuits without requiring surgery. Further, we have shown this ultrasonic neuromodulation approach confers a spatial resolution approximately five times greater than TMS and can exert its effects upon subcortical brain circuits deep within the brain.”

Tyler’s technology, packaged in a warfighter’s helmet, would allow soldiers to flip a switch to stimulate different regions of their brains, helping them relieve battle stress when it’s time to get some rest, or to boost alertness during long periods without sleep. Grunts could even relieve pain from injuries or wounds without resorting to pharmaceutical drugs. More importantly, in the periods after brain trauma ultrasound technology could reduce swelling and metabolic damage that is often the root cause of lasting brain damage.

This brings me to the part that I want to talk about; the morality and the ethics of doing something like this. To start off it seems like DARPA wants a soldier that will not feel pain and when that will stay sane during combat. As one commenter said “DARPA, if you want to turn people into robots you should probably start by making better robots and work less at dehumanizing people. Chances are you're gonna cause more brain damage then you'll prevent, not to mention the unwanted dependency soldiers might experience if they leave that thing on for too long. Taking off the soldier's helmet could be comparable to amputation if left on for too long. And what do you think would happen if the thing malfunctions in the middle of the field. Think before you act.”

In addition there’s the possibility of abuse of the system by soldiers themselves or even by a higher command. As another commenter said “I could see a small amount of satisfaction from the soldiers hacking it to aim it at the pleasure center of the brain. ...that is until they became so addicted that they pleasured themselves to starvation.” Also the experience of shows how the commanders can misuse their subordinate troops: “I was in the Military in the early 1980's. We were playing "war games" once and we were all in full chemical suits. The commanding officer called the enlisted people together and asked who the lowest ranking individual was. A young kid came up and the officer told the guy that he was now part of “Operation Canary". Then he told him to remove his gas mask and take a deep breath.
The idea behind it was we needed to know if there was gas around and if there was gas we could determine what kind by the reaction of the enlisted guy. There was a medic there with stuff to counter gas exposure, but still that was messed up.”

Share your opinions in the comments below!

Sprint, AT&T, Verizon...and Wal-Mart??


Apparently, Wal-Mart doesn’t think they sell enough things at the cheapest rate so they have decided to go into the cell phone market. Their plans are aimed towards the lower tier of income who still want unlimited talk and text but cannot afford such a plan on carriers like AT&T and Verizon. Wal-Mart seems to have done it because their unlimited talk and unlimited text plan is only $45 a month, and the best part? NO CONTRACT! Even the current budget cell carrier, T-mobile, has its price set at $60 for its unlimited talk and unlimited text plan without a contract. AT&T and Verizon are much, much more expensive at $70 and $90 respectively and they both require contracts! Your probably think "This is too good to be true!", well you're half right.

The unlimited talk and unlimited text plan is truly only $45 but, because there is no contract, the upfront cost of the actual phone will be much more expensive than usual. Also, you won't be able to get any of the fancy phones that AT&T and Verizon carry such as the iPhone 4 and the multitude of Droids but even if Wal-Mart somehow manages to snag Droid for their network you wouldn’t be able to afford it. Why you ask? Because the data rates are outrageous! Wal-Mart is charging $40 per gigabyte of data used where AT&T only charges $25 for 2 gigabytes and T-mobile charges $30 for unlimited data! But I guess since Wal-mart is aiming for the lower tier of the market (low income families and teens having to pay for their own cell service) they probably wouldn’t want to pay for data anyways.

High Emissions Low Emotion..wait, i mean High Emotion Low Emissions

Ferrari California with HELE System
Ferrari has decided that they are not content with being one of the best makers of supercars in all of history but now, it seems as though they are trying to make their cars greener little by little. In the new Ferrari California they have added a new system called HELE. HELE stands for High Emotion Low Emissions (I'm waiting for the day when some Ferrari spokesperson says that in the wrong order). The system tweaks a bunch of electronics such as a quick start/stop function, intelligent engine fan and fuel pump control, electronically controlled variable displacement air-conditioning technology and adaptive gear shifts.

 The start/stop function seems to be the most interesting item here as it can restart the car in 230 milliseconds. This is the same amount of time that it takes you to move your foot from the brake pedal to the gas. So when you are in slow city traffic or just sitting at a red light the engine will automatically shut of while you are stopped and then turn back on as soon as you take your foot of the brake. The sound of the engine starting has also been reduced so much so that you will barely even notice, but don’t worry, when you start the car for the first time it will still be as loud and amazing sounding as ever. Your probably thinking "does all this actually do anything at all?", well actually it does.

The HELE system manages to reduce the CO2 emissions by 23%. The most important part is that it does this without sacrificing ANY perceptible performance at all. This is extremely important because when you are spending 200k on an exotic sports car, you probably couldn’t care less about how green your car is but if it was sacrificing performance for being green you probably would just go on to the next exotic car maker. If you are getting the same performance plus reduced emissions as a bonus then this may even convince some buyers from, for example, Lamborghini, to get the California instead of Gallardo. 

Tablets + Cars = ?




Tablets are growing more and more popular nowadays, but they are still, FOR THE MOST PART (I don’t want any controversy here), a rich mans toy. They can cost as much as a laptop but are not versatile enough to replace one. This trend has apparently been noticed by a few of the higher end car makers, BMW and Peugeot.

BMW was the first car maker to include full integration in their cars with Apple's iPod and it seems as they want to continue this with the very first car maker that can fully integrate iPads into their cars. BMW seems to enjoy telling everyone that they are the first at this but is it really something that they should be telling people? What do I think? NO!

First of all the car that modeled the iPad integration was a convertible 3 series. This is about as sporty as you can get without stepping up to the "M" division of BMW which makes all their sport tuned vehicles. So with such a sporty car, safety should be a chief concern. Apparently the engineers over in Germany were not thinking about that when they designed the iPad holders. When the iPads are docked onto the car, they protrude a couple inches from the back of the headrest. In the 3 series being one of the smaller of BMW's lineup and being a convertible, the rear passenger do not get very much space. What do you think would happen to the people in the rear seats if you even lightly rear ended someone? SMACK! Their faces are going to be smacked straight into that $700 piece of glass and its going to hurt. Real bad.


Second, you are buying a $50,000 car that’s meant to be fun to drive and look amazing. When you stick two iPads behind the front seat headrests it absolutely ruins the former beauty of the car. The whole thing just looks UGLY but I really hate the white Apple cord that plugs into the bottom of the iPad (shown above). When you are paying $3000 (!!!) for a seat upgrade so that the leather is nicer I think the least BMW could have done is to match the cord to the leather color. BMW showed this off at the Paris Auto Show in a 3 series. For those of you who don’t know, the 3 series contains BMWs entry level (the 1 series doesn’t count) lineup of cars. These cars have been given best car in its class for more than 10 years by reputable sources such as "Car and Driver" and "Road and Track" because of how good they look, how well they drive and the quality of their build. Notice that I did not mention anything about technology, that’s because the 3 series generally is more about the drive rather than the tech. This is why I feel that if anything at all the iPad integration should not be allowed in the 3 series but rather, it should be an option in the 7 series, which is BMW's flagship luxury car with all the tech you can possibly think of available as an option, oh and theres also a little, just a little bit more space between the back of the headrest and the back seat in the 7 series.


Okay I'm done ranting about the horrendous iPad integration into BMWs so we'll talk about Peugeots advance into tablets in cars market. Peugeot recently showed off its new concept car, the HR1, at the Paris Auto Show. Unlike the BMW, this integration of a tablet into a car looks amazing and fits perfectly with the futuristic look of the car. Since this is a concept car, there are not many details but we know that the tablet (it seems to be an Archos branded) will, when docked, be able to connect seamlessly to the cars built in computer and electronics system. Also, rather than using the tablets touchscreen, you will be able to control it via some sort of gesture recognition system. More often than not, these kinds of radical new technologies don’t usually work as well as they sound. 

Volvo's Pedestrian Avoidance Doesn't Work So Well...

So say you’re driving in a school zone (what’s with me and school zones?) and you start to doze off but little Sally is crossing the street. Volvo’s new pedestrian avoidance system will keep you from hitting little Sally. What the system is supposed to do is if your car senses a human in the way of its path, it's supposed to alert you, suggest you brake and generally help you avoid hitting someone. As you can see in the video below, there is a reason why car companies use dummies for crash testing.

In Volvo’s defense, the system worked most of the time and this particular incident was blamed on the “improper placement of the dummy.” Below shows how the system should have worked.

Working Tractor Beams, Not Just Sci Fi


The tractor beam in action suspends a small particle over an optics table.
You know that one scene in Star Wars where the Millennium Falcon is captured in Death Star’s tractor beam and is pulled in. Sure you do. Anyways that’s still not possible. But if you needed to move a couple of small particles say five feet; you can now do that.


Using only light, Australian researchers say they are able to move small particles almost five feet through the air. This is more than 100 times the distance achieved by existing optical “tweezers,” the researchers say.


Unlike the tractor beams in Star Wars, these ones work by shining a hollow laser beam at an object and taking advantage of air-temperature differences to move it around. The air around the particle heats up, but the hollow center of the beam stays cool. The heated air molecules keep the object balanced in the dark center. But a small amount of light sneaks into the hollow, warming the air on one side of the object and nudging it along the length of the laser beam. Researchers can change the speed and direction of the glass object by changing the lasers’ brightness.


To my surprise, moving particles with powerful lights is not a new technology. Researchers have long been using optical tweezers to pluck bacteria-sized particles and move them a few millimeters. The U.S. Secretary of Energy, Steven Chu, won his Nobel Prize for work with optical tweezers. But Andrei Rhode and colleagues at the Australian National University say their new laser device can move glass objects hundreds of times bigger than bacteria, and move them a meter and a half or more. Rhode says the 1.5-meter limit was only because of the size of the table where he placed his lasers; he thinks he can move objects up to 10 meters, or about 30 feet.


Evidently the tractor beam system needs heated air to work, so currently, it won’t work in space. So no Millennium Falcon grabbing beams yet.

My First Little Battlemech

Dear Mom and Dad, please get this for my birthday. I mean what little kid hasn’t wanted to wreak havoc while riding in claw-equipped battlemech. Now their dreams can come true with the “Kid’s Walker”.

New from Japan (of course it’s from Japan), is the “Kid’s Walker”. Created by Sakakirba Kikai, the same man who made the life size robot “Land Walker”, he plans to rent the walker out to kids. I imagine someone being real popular when they bring this thing to the local playground. Now if you really wanted to buy this mech it will run you about $21,000. I mean what could possibly go wrong if little Bobby had this Christmas morning.


Twitter Delicious Facebook Digg Stumbleupon Favorites More

 
Powered by Blogger